Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G200 5G's 86.2 global score. Although Galaxy S10e is a lot older than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, it's construction is somewhat thinner and much lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a slightly better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density.
The Moto G200 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Galaxy S10e features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G200 5G features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.