Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G's score of 86.2. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 has 13 version and Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11. The Galaxy S20 body is thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto G200 5G, although it was released only 21 months before.
Galaxy S20 features a processing unit that's very similar to the Motorola Moto G200 5G one, and although the Galaxy S20 has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit sharper display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and more pixels per inch of display.
The Moto G200 5G captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera with much more MP and better video frame rate. The Galaxy S20 counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Moto G200 5G features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.