Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is a bit better than the Moto G200 5G's 86.2 overall score. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Although the Galaxy S20 FE is older than the Moto G200 5G, it's construction is just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little sharper display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a quite greater amount of pixels in each inch of display. Motorola Moto G200 5G has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G200 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Moto G200 5G has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.