Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G's 86.2 score. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a little heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto G200 5G, but they are 0.35inches thick.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better looking display than Moto G200 5G, because it has a little bit bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a better pixels density. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior camera than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a camera with a 108 mega-pixels, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration is just as good as Moto G200 5G's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.