Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is a bit better than the Moto G200 5G, having a 93.4 score against 86.2. Even though the Galaxy S22 and Moto G200 5G were only released with a few months difference, the Galaxy S22 is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while Moto G200 5G has Android 11 version, so it provides you some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much better display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density. Galaxy S22's memory for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Moto G200 5G's one, both of them have equal internal storage capacity.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S22. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy S22 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with much less MP resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot higher video resolution.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has improved battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.