Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than Moto G200 5G's 86.2 general score. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction has the same thickness than Moto G200 5G, but it's somewhat heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Moto G200 5G has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper display than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a better pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has as much storage for applications and games as the Motorola Moto G200 5G one, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Moto G200 5G features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a battery performance that is very similar to the Moto G200 5G one. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior camera than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 108 mega pixels resolution, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments and a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.