Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-11-18 | -- |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.13 ounces | -- |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | -- |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, with a 90.7 score against 86.2. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is notably lighter and notably thinner than the Motorola Moto G200 5G. Both devices we compare here come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version and Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11, providing the user a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better display than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a higher pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better camera than Moto G200 5G, because it has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, a much higher video definition and a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G200 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a battery duration that is very similar to the battery duration in Moto G200 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.