Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, having an 86.2 score against 78.1. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Moto G200 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2. The Moto G200 5G construction is way newer, but a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus.
Moto G200 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and 6 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S5 Plus has a brighter screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel number in each inch of screen.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a much more mega pixels back camera and a larger aperture.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 79% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.