Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Blue and Red |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is better than Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 general score. Moto G200 5G's body has the same thickness than Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's a lot heavier. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Moto G200 5G has the previous 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a sharper display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Moto G200 5G has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 6 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. The Moto G200 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a much higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.