Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-11-18 | -- |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | -- |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | -- |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 score. Both devices in this review use Android operating system, but the Moto G200 5G has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, counting with a couple nice extra features and increased performance. Moto G200 5G's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy S6 Active, but it is heavier.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bit CPU. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a much sharper screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a back facing camera with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
The Moto G200 5G has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.