Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy S7, having an 86.2 score against 79.5. The Moto G200 5G design is a lot newer than the Galaxy S7's, although it is somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. Moto G200 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more CPU cores and 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number in each inch in the screen and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Moto G200 5G counts with a better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Moto G200 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.