Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with an 86.2 score against 75.8. The Moto G200 5G design is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, although it's just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy S7 Active has a brighter display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel quantity per inch in the display and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Moto G200 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more processing cores and more RAM. Moto G200 5G has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much better 108 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Moto G200 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G200 5G has superior battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.