Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-11-18 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is much better than the Galaxy S7 edge, with an 86.2 score against 78.1. Moto G200 5G is a incredibly newer cellphone than Galaxy S7 edge, although it is somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G200 5G has an older 11 version and Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Moto G200 5G has a bit better processor than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher screen pixels density.
Moto G200 5G features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution. Moto G200 5G counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto G200 5G has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 39% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.