Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S8, getting a score of 86.2 against 81.7. The Moto G200 5G design is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy S8's, but it is noticeably heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy S8 has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy S8 has a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Motorola Moto G200 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Moto G200 5G features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.