Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Gold and Gray |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, with an 86.2 score against 81.9. The Moto G200 5G construction is newer, just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a bit better display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and more pixels per screen inch. The Moto G200 5G features a lot better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy S8 Active features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Moto G200 5G features greater battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.