Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a general score of 86.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S9's 83.3 overall score. Motorola Moto G200 5G is a a lot newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S9, although it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Moto G200 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S9 features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Moto G200 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much higher 108 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy S9 features more storage for applications and games than Moto G200 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 400 GB. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.