Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black |
| Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 score. Even though Moto G200 5G and the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 were released only 8 months apart, the Moto G200 5G design is heavier but also a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5. Both phones we are comparing here include the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide the user identical operating system features.
Moto G200 5G features a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Moto G200 5G has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a bigger display, a higher screen pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
The Galaxy XCover 5 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G200 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
Moto G200 5G takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.