Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | -- |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, getting a global score of 86.2 against 77.6. Even when the Motorola Moto G200 5G and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro were only released 7 months apart, the Motorola Moto G200 5G is thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
The Moto G200 5G has just a bit better display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory.
Moto G200 5G counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images, it also counts with a way more megapixels camera. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Moto G200 5G features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 23 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.