Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 86.2 score against 80.1. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Moto G200 5G has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Moto G200 5G is a newer phone, and it is also noticeably lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Moto G200 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Moto G200 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Moto G200 5G has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.