Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than Motorola Moto G200 5G, with an 88.5 score against 86.2. Galaxy Z Flip is an older device than Motorola Moto G200 5G, but it is just a little lighter and thinner anyway. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11 version, providing some additional features.
Galaxy Z Flip's processor is very similar to the CPU in Motorola Moto G200 5G, both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little sharper screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a just a bit greater pixels density.
The Moto G200 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera with a way better resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Moto G200 5G has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.