Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.88 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, getting a general score of 86.2 against 85.6. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. The Moto G200 5G is an a bit heavier and much thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit sharper display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as Moto G200 5G, both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a much better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Moto G200 5G takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.