Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is slightly better than Motorola Moto G200 5G, getting a 92.3 score against 86.2. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, despite of the fact that it was released around 16 months before.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch and a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better processor than Moto G200 5G. Both have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has more internal memory. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52 percent greater battery size. Moto G200 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.