Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G200 5G, with a overall score of 94.6 against 86.2. These phones use the same Android 11 OS. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and extremely heavier than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, it's design is still a lot thinner. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better CPU than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Moto G200 5G and Galaxy Z Fold 2 both feature similar screens, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a just a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208. Moto G200 5G features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing images or videos in low light environments and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.