Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.88 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is slightly better than Motorola Moto G200 5G, with a 90.6 score against 86.2. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should provide you identical operating system features. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Motorola Moto G200 5G were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is thinner but noticeably heavier than Motorola Moto G200 5G.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3's CPU is very similar to the Moto G200 5G one, and although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 4 GB more RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixel amount per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because it has more internal storage. Moto G200 5G has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger aperture for better low-light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.