Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a general score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 score. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G200 5G has the older 11 version and Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although the Moto G200 5G is somewhat heavier than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's incredibly thinner and also way newer.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much better display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel number per screen inch. Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 400 GB.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Moto G200 5G has a superior camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a bigger aperture.
Moto G200 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 74 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.