Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is much better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G's global score of 76.1. Even though the Motorola Moto G200 5G and TCL 20 Pro 5G were only released with a few months difference, Motorola Moto G200 5G's body is just a little thinner but a little heavier. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The Moto G200 5G has a little sharper display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a just a little more pixels per display inch. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Moto G200 5G, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity.
The Moto G200 5G has a bit better hardware performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Moto G200 5G shoots slightly better photographs and videos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a little longer battery life than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.