Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark's 80.4 overall score. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Moto G200 5G has 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie. The Moto G200 5G is a noticeably newer and a little thinner phone than Xiaomi Black Shark, but it is also just a little heavier.
Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a bit better looking display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the Motorola Moto G200 5G, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark. Both of them have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G200 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Moto G200 5G counts with improved battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.