Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, having a global score of 86.6 against 86.2. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the previous 10 version while Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 construction is older, thicker and just a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G200 5G.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 and Moto G200 5G both have quite similar displays, although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a bit smaller screen, a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features just a little better performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3. They have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 captures clearer videos and photos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a way worse 64 MP resolution camera in the back and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has as much storage for apps and games as the Moto G200 5G one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory.
The Moto G200 5G features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.