Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, getting an 86.2 score against 81.4. Both devices in this review come with Android OS, but Motorola Moto G200 5G has older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Moto G200 5G is a a lot newer cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, although it's thicker and much heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels in each inch in the display. Moto G200 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE and Moto G200 5G feature similar storage to install games and applications, both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto G200 5G counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3070mAh. Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots slightly better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.