Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a overall score of 86.2 against 81.1. These phones include Android operating system, but Moto G200 5G has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10. Moto G200 5G is a a little bit lighter phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but they are equally thin.
Moto G200 5G features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Moto G200 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a just a bit greater pixels density, a little bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2460px resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G200 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro have incredibly similar batteries duration, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better camera than Moto G200 5G, although it has a lower video quality and a lot less mega-pixels camera in the back, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.