Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 35.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is much better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, getting an 86.2 score against 78.1. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding operating system features. Although it's the best phone in this review, Moto G200 5G's design is thicker and just a little heavier than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better processor than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. They have 8 cores and a 8 GB RAM. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra and Moto G200 5G feature very similar screens, although the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a bit smaller display, a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit less pixels per screen inch.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a way less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a much higher video resolution. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Motorola Moto G200 5G one, they have the same internal memory capacity.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better battery life than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a 9 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.