Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G30's 78.1 score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto G30, even when both were released only 1 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a better looking screen than Moto G30, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G30, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto G30 features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G features a better camera than Motorola Moto G30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography, and they both have a 64 mega-pixels back camera, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.