Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-16 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Moto G30, with a 97.6 score against 78.1. The Galaxy Fold body is way thinner than the Moto G30, although it's incredibly heavier and was released just a little more than a year before. Galaxy Fold counts with a sharper screen than Moto G30, because it has a little bigger display, a way better 1536 x 2152px resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Fold has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G30, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little faster processor than Moto G30, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Moto G30 has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4380mAh. Moto G30 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G30 also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.