Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-02-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Motorola Moto G30, having a 90.8 score against 78.1. Even when Galaxy Note 20 and Motorola Moto G30 were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy Note 20 is a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G30, because it has a little bit larger display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a better screen pixels density.
Moto G30 has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto G30 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto G30 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Moto G30 also has faster 60 fps video frame rate, a bigger camera aperture and a way more MP camera in the back. The Motorola Moto G30 counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.