Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Moto G30, with a 98.9 score against 78.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Moto G30 were only released with a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is just a bit heavier but also thinner than the Moto G30.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G30, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a little larger display and a way better number of pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit superior processor than Moto G30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than Moto G30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G30, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G30 has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.