Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G30's 78.1 score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note 3 is older than the Motorola Moto G30, it's construction is lighter and just a bit thinner. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much sharper screen than Moto G30, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a higher amount of pixels per display inch.
The Moto G30 has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 3 features a little better processing power than Moto G30, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Moto G30 counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Motorola Moto G30 captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G30 also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.