Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than Moto G30's global score of 78.1. Even though Galaxy Note 5 is older than Moto G30, it's construction is thinner and lighter. The Moto G30 has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto G30 also has a greater number of cores (but slower).
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better screen than Moto G30, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a much higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G30 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G30 counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The Moto G30 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G30 also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light environments and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.