Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-02-16 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is better than the Moto G30, having a general score of 89 against 78.1. Samsung Galaxy Note10's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G30, despite of the fact that it was released a bit more over a year before. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has just a bit better performance than Moto G30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a sharper display than Moto G30, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2280 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. Moto G30 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing images and video in low light situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G30 also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution.
The Motorola Moto G30 features just a bit more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G30 has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.