Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-02-16 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than the Moto G30's 78.1 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 is an older cellphone than Moto G30, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy Note5 has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G30, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater count of pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Moto G30 counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note5 features just a bit better processing power than Moto G30. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
Moto G30 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Motorola Moto G30 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G30 also has faster 60 fps video frame rate, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.