Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Motorola Moto G30, getting a general score of 98 against 78.1. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is a little bit thinner than the Motorola Moto G30, but it's a bit heavier and was released about 12 months before. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better display than Motorola Moto G30, because it has a way better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a little bit larger screen and a way greater count of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G30, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G30, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G30 and the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G both feature extremely similar batteries duration. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater camera than Motorola Moto G30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a way more MP back camera and a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.