Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Moto G30, getting a global score of 95.4 against 78.1. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is newer and just a little thinner than Moto G30's, but it's heavier. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little faster processing unit than Moto G30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper display than Moto G30, because it has a bit larger screen, a much greater display density and a way higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better camera than Moto G30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
The Motorola Moto G30 counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G30 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery performance is just as good as the battery duration in Motorola Moto G30.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.