Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-02-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than Moto G30, having a score of 80.1 against 78.1. Even being the best device in this review, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an older, extremely thicker and notably heavier device than the Moto G30. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better looking screen than Moto G30, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and way more pixels per inch of screen.
Moto G30 counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto G30 also has 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better hardware performance than Moto G30. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
Moto G30 has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Moto G30 shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Moto G30 also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.