Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Moto G30, having a general score of 81 against 78.1. Despite being the best phone we compare here, Galaxy XCover Pro's body is older, just a little bit heavier and a little thicker than the Moto G30. Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G30, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot greater screen density.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G30. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Moto G30 takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same aperture and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G30 also has higher video frame rates and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Moto G30 features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G30 also has more internal memory. The Moto G30 has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.