Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than the Motorola Moto G30's 78.1 global score. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is just a little lighter and a lot thinner than Motorola Moto G30, although it was released a little bit over a year before. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G30, because it has a quite larger display, a lot more pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px. The Moto G30 has a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G30 features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G30 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G30 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures in low light situations and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.