Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G30, with a overall score of 92.3 against 78.1. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is much thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G30, even when they were released with only 6 months difference. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a sharper display than Motorola Moto G30, because it has a much higher pixels density, a quite larger display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2636.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit faster processor than Moto G30, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G30 features slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G30 has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Moto G30 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Moto G30 also has a larger camera aperture for better low light photos and videos and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.