Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Moto G30, with a 94.6 score against 78.1. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is incredibly heavier but extremely thinner than the Moto G30, and they were only released 5 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a brighter display than Moto G30, because it has a lot better resolution of 1768 x 2208px, a larger display and a better pixels density.
Moto G30 has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better performance than Moto G30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Moto G30 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Moto G30 also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and video and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Moto G30 counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.