Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Pastel sky and Phantom black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.89 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is better than the Motorola Moto G30's 78.1 general score. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Motorola Moto G30 were released with only a couple of months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is extremely heavier but way thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G30, because it has a greater pixel density, a way better resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a larger screen.
The Moto G30 features a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little better hardware performance than Moto G30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Moto G30 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Moto G30 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way bigger aperture and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.