Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-06 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Moto G31's 77 general score. The Galaxy A50 design is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G31, even though it was released many years before. Galaxy A50 counts with a display that is very similar to Motorola Moto G31's display, and although the Galaxy A50 has a little bit less pixels per display inch and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a screen of the same size.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G31, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit better CPU than Moto G31. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G31 takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G31 also counts with a much better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Moto G31 counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.