Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-06 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is better than Moto G31's 77 score. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) design is a little bit thinner than the Moto G31, although it is just a little heavier and was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit faster processor than Moto G31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G31 counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has slightly more memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Moto G31 has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32 percent bigger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s camera is very similar to the Moto G31 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a lot less MP camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.