Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-12-06 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Moto G31, with a score of 97.6 against 77. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G31 has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy Fold is an a lot older and a lot heavier cellphone than Moto G31, but Samsung was able to make it incredibly thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a little better processing power than Moto G31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G31 features a bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Moto G31 has a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G31 also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Fold has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G31, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Moto G31 features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.